Why isn’t it possible to play a fun and serious game of poker not for money?And the foolish nudgelords who associate the Soviet Union with environmental protectionAndrew GelmanMay 12, 20266ShareThe week before last on the blog:What advice do you have for this student who’s in his first year of college and interested in both statistics and political science?A study is retracted after it turns out that its authors were misrepresented as “third-party experts” even though they were actually paid by the company?Show me scienceTaking one more swing at the foolish nudgelords who associate the Soviet Union with environmental protectionSurvey Statistics: exploded logit !Hey! Try out the RMET (“the Reading the Mind in the Eyes test”).Should French pollsters be using Mister P?Why isn’t it possible to play a fun and serious game of poker not for money?Enjoy.Thanks for reading The Future of Statistical Modeling! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.Subscribe
